Hi Kathleen - this did not go out as a newsletter. For some reason, the last couple of days Substack has been resending posts from various substacks where it appears someone edited their post that just went out and the post was resent. Other times, the post appears on the site, but not in the inbox.
So I didn't know this was here until I noticed it this afternoon.
As for the post itself - glad nothing was damaged.
elm
strange, i guess people sometimes just gotta have it
Thank you for telling me. I usually get about 300 views and this got only 7--which seemed odd (and discouraging), so your message has made me feel much better. Then I saw this was all in the news today so I thought maybe it was "old news"--even tho I had it the instant the Cambridge librarian sent us in "library land" the news.
He should have had Nancy do the drawing.
Hi Kathleen - this did not go out as a newsletter. For some reason, the last couple of days Substack has been resending posts from various substacks where it appears someone edited their post that just went out and the post was resent. Other times, the post appears on the site, but not in the inbox.
So I didn't know this was here until I noticed it this afternoon.
As for the post itself - glad nothing was damaged.
elm
strange, i guess people sometimes just gotta have it
Thank you for telling me. I usually get about 300 views and this got only 7--which seemed odd (and discouraging), so your message has made me feel much better. Then I saw this was all in the news today so I thought maybe it was "old news"--even tho I had it the instant the Cambridge librarian sent us in "library land" the news.
I think maybe substack changed the default settings? I dunno.
I'd send it again, I'm sure someone on the back 40 hasn't heard. 😉
elm
frequently the back 40 includes me