That page was beautiful! A friend from grad school wrote her dissertation on print technology in the novels of Samuel Richardson (who was a printer, as Iām sure you know). She looked at ornaments, typography, and other visual aspects of the text. I saw many of the examples she discussed, and it was fascinating.
The sad truth of the literary world ignores its destined potential as a ladder, instead debasing it as a platform of self-serving intent. That's not art. It's not even good literature, no matter how beautifully presented it may be.
Almost anything can serve as e collection
That page was beautiful! A friend from grad school wrote her dissertation on print technology in the novels of Samuel Richardson (who was a printer, as Iām sure you know). She looked at ornaments, typography, and other visual aspects of the text. I saw many of the examples she discussed, and it was fascinating.
The sad truth of the literary world ignores its destined potential as a ladder, instead debasing it as a platform of self-serving intent. That's not art. It's not even good literature, no matter how beautifully presented it may be.
The website is really nice. Though they should give Hart Crane his own page in the Poets section