20 Comments
User's avatar
HardeeHo's avatar

All the more reason to scan these treasures, at least for researchers.

Expand full comment
Peter Cordwell's avatar

Are Playboy mags available in your libraries? Never seen them over here. Nice to be in touch.

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

They used to be but I haven't looked in a while. When I worked in a library we had to keep them behind the desk--not for censorship, but because they got stolen.

Expand full comment
Marci Sudlow's avatar

That's too funny!

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

That being a more sheltered time I would be asked if the Playboy with the interview was available and then the young man would blush.

Expand full comment
Adele Fasick's avatar

More sad news about people trying to destroy other people's ability to express their ideas and beliefs. Destroying a library is always a bad idea, but it is a continuing problem. Why are people so afraid of ideas?

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

I wonder this every day!

Expand full comment
Russo Radio's avatar

Somehow atrocities like this are seemingly ALL done in the name of a god or religion!

Ironically sad 🤮

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

Yes, in the early days of writing these entries it was mostly religion. They used to burn the people, too.

Expand full comment
PJ Leigh's avatar

Tragic, no doubt, but knowledge cannot be destroyed...only the vessel that holds it. These can be replaced so long as we retain the capacity to bring it forth. Is this not the test of our time?

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

Yes, content and knowledge can be saved--but some of the ancient manuscripts are gone.

Expand full comment
Andrew Teeple's avatar

True, but manuscripts like these are not just knowledge but art. Some of the value in these items is in the aesthetic nature of the works.

Expand full comment
Peter Cordwell's avatar

I bet they did.

Expand full comment
Peter Cordwell's avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
Martin Black's avatar

So sad

Expand full comment
Peter Cordwell's avatar

Oh dear, that's terrible, and we're bound to wonder if the MAGA terrorists will plan to add burning to banning, if some of them are not doing that already. Can we send a message to Bihar Sharif with all of our names added?

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

I think the gov't is going to pay for restoration. It seems everyone wants to ban books.

The good side is that they all think books are important.

Expand full comment
Bill Heath's avatar

Sir, MAGA is not a curse word, despite Joe Biden's best efforts. It stands for Make America Great Again. Do you have a problem with America striving to become better, to become great? That would mean all of America, not just white heterosexuals.

Expand full comment
Russo Radio's avatar

Peter - mandates and lockdowns are part of only one party’s plans as evidenced…

Books within libraries should be Age Appropriate!

If they had playboy magazines and equivalents in our junior high ,they would have had to double the size of the library or limit the time youngsters could spend there.

Parents should have plenty to say about what their children are being exposed to until they’re “adults “ ! We needed a-note from our parents to go to a museum for Christ Sake !

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Really inflammatory comment. The books to be removed from school libraries are what some might say are too explicit of the ages involved. Apparently there are parts that cannot be read aloud on TV. I can see some parents might be offended. For the public at large we are far from removing Lady Chatterley from libraries as we once did. We once tried to shield children from some content and still we have movies with a R or X restriction.

In my formative years I enjoyed Mike Hammer books which were adult content. I doubt much of that was attractive to pre-teens. But I was spared from 'One Hundred and Twenty Days of Sodom" by DeSade until much later.

Expand full comment