11 Comments

Blameless secret. Indeed!

Expand full comment

He would be scorned today for his cultural appropriation. In his time he was more popular than Arthur Conan Doyle. Almost all of his books are audioes on YouTube.

Expand full comment

A lot of 19th century writers like that, I do believe. I suppose that makes Kai Lung the predecessor of Charlie Chan.

"Smith’s decision to use certain types of exaggerated language in the context of his times established the “Chineseness” of his discourse."

That said, who's Smith?

elm

?

Expand full comment

O, good eye. His full name was Ernest Brammah Smith but he wrote under "Ernest Brammah"---the fellow writing about him for some reason used his real last name. I will update. THANK YOU

Expand full comment

Yeah, that's what I thought but I wasn't sure.

elm

no problem

Expand full comment

I ran across an oldish (1960s) article where the writer was reporting on antiquarian book sales and couldn't figure out why Ernest Brammah (Smith) books were selling high at auction. I figured Ransom Center (sure enough; they are like a vacuum cleaner). And then I found someone had used the archive and found out "the secret." And you are right...he was same era as Charlie Chan.

Expand full comment

I have a hazy memory of a number of books (a whole genre, really) of highly dubious fiction written by authors with fake oriental names/fiction presented as purported non-fiction similar to what Smith was writing. I believe it was written to satisfy the orientalism of the late 19th century.

elm

it's been awhile

Expand full comment

I recently listened to a Yascha Mounk Persuasion podcast with Rachel Fraser on standpoint theory. I was fascinated by her explanation of the difference between propositional knowledge and experiential knowledge. I wonder if Brammah was a propositional expert on China?

Expand full comment

I will have to listen to that. (o, I see there is a transcript).

Expand full comment

Sunday it's good catchup time. until baseball playoffs.

Expand full comment